Skip to main content

Full text of "George Steinbrenner"

See other formats



o 


o 


'S *' 


PAGE TWO DE F8IJK 00Q2 UNCLAS 

h6 per FBI 

TAMPA DIVISION, ON JULY 17, 1991. b7c 


REQUEST OF THE BUREAU: 

FBIHQ IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE JACKSONVILLE DIVISION 
WITH A POLICY DETERMINATION AS TO DISCLOSURE WITHIN THE U.S. 
NAVY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOO) OF INVESTIGATION 
CONDUCTED IN CAPTIONED MATTER. 

ON JULY 12, 1991, SUPERVISORY SPECIAL AGENT (SSA) 
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION, MET WITH SSA 


AND 


SA[ 


] FRAUD UNIT, NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE (NIS), 


JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. DURING THIS MEETING, SSA 
PROVIDED SSa | [ with A COPY OF AN ANONYMOUS LETTER WHICH WAS 
RECEIVED BY NIS HEADQUARTERS (NISHQ) IN WASHINGTON, D.C. THE 
POSTMARK ON THE ENVELOPE INDICATED THAT THIS LETTER WAS MAILED 
FROM SOUTHERN BALTIMORE, MARYLAND. ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN 
THIS LETTER ARE SUMMARIZED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. GEORGE STEINBRENNER, OWNER OF AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING 
COMPANY (ASC), TAMPA, FLORIDA, PAID A $100,000 BRIBE TO THE 


U.S. NAVY (USN) COMMANDER FOR CONTRACTS DIRECTORATE, 


IN EXCHANGE FOR ASC RECEIVING A $58 MILLION 


CONTRACT TO BUILD SIX NAVY TRANSPORT VESSELS KNOWN AS T-AGOS- 


23*S. EVENTUAL VALUE OF THIS CONTRACT COULD EXCEED $100 


b6 per FBI 
b7C 


b6 per NCIS 
b7C 


b6 per NCIS 
b7C 



o 


o 


V 


PAGE THREE OE FBIJK 0002 UNCLAS 


MILLION. 

2. THE $100,000 PAID TO [ 
DIVIDED EQUALLY BETWEENl 


WAS TO BE 


AND USN 


COMMANDER OF NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND, WHICH IS 
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AWARDING OF ALL USN CONTRACTS. 

3. FORMER USN 


b6 per NCIS 
:b7C 


PERSONAL FRIEND AND FORMER CLASSMATE 0F[ 


(RETIRED), A CLOSE 
| WAS 


ALSO OFFERED THE POSITION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) OF 
ASC IN TAMPA, FLORIDA, IN EXCHANGE FOR ASC RECEIVING THE 
CONTRACT. 

PROGRAM MANAGER, NAVAL SEA 


A. 


SYSTEMS COMMAND, OPPOSED THE AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT TO ASC 
DUE TO THEIR LACK OF FINANCIAL CAPABILITY, PRIOR POOR 
PERFORMANCE AND LACK OF QUALITY ASSURANCE CONTROL TO PERFORM 
THE CONTRACT. ALLEGEDLY, 


WAS RECENTLY FORCED TO 


b6 per NCIS 
b7C 


RETIRE AS A RESULT OF THIS SITUATION. 

ON JULY 12, 1991, A COPY OF THIS ANONYMOUS LETTER MAS 
FAXED TO THE MANAGING ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY (MAUSA) 

ImIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (MDF), 


b6 per FBI 
b7C 


JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDAi AND A CONFERENCE CALL WAS HELD 




o 


o 




PAGE FOUR DE F8IJK 0002 UNCLAS 

CONCERNING THE ABOVE. AFTER A REVIEW OF THE ANONYMOUS LETTER 


AND DISCUSSIONS WITH SSA 


AND SSA 


MAUSA 


ADVISED THAT AN INVEStiGATION SHOULD BE INITIATED 

CONCERNING THE ALLEGATIONS^ AND IF THE ABOVE ALLEGATIONS ARE 
SUBSTANTIATED, PROSECUTION UNDER THE FOLLOWING STATUTES WOULD 
BE PURSUED: 

1. HOBBS ACT-EXTORTION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; 

2. MC NALLY AMENDMENTS TO THE MAIL FRAUD STATUTE, 18 
U.S. CODE, SECTION 1341; 

3. CONSPIRACY, 18 U.S. CODE, SECTION 371; 

4. FRAUD BY WIRE, 18 U.S. CODE, SECTION 1343; 

5. BRIBERY, 18 U.S. CODE, SECTION 201; AND 

6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST, 18 U.S. CODE, SECTION 208. 


MAUSA 


ADVISED THAT PROSECUTIVE VENUE COULD LIE b6 per FB; 


IN JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, FOR SOME, IF NOT ALL, OF THE ABOVE 
VIOLATIONS, INASMUCH AS ALL NAVY CONTRACTS IN THIS REGION 
(INCLUDES TAMPA, ORLANDO AND JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA) ARE 
ADMINISTERED BY THE USN IN JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. 


MAUSA 


ADVISED THAT THERE MAY POSSIBLY BE A 


PROBLEM CONCERNING PROSECUTION IN THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF 


)6 per FB] 
)7C 


FLORIDA (MDF) DUE TO A PERSONAL FRIENDSHIP THAT EXISTS BETWEEN 



o 


o 


PAGE FIVE DE FBUK 0002 UNCLAS 


THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ROBERT GENZMAN, AND GEORGE 


STEINBRENNER. MAUSA 


ADVISED THAT HE WOULD CONTACT 


GENZHAN, ADVISE HIM OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION AND RECONTACT SSA 


■bo per FBI 
hlC 


WITH GENZMAN’S DECISION. 


ON JULY 15, 1991, MAUSA 


ADVISED SSA 




THAT 


U.S. ATTORNEY GENZMAN WILL RECUSE HIS OFFICE IN THE HDF 


(INCLUDES JACKSONVILLE) FROM PROSECUTION IN THIS MATTER, AND 


HAD INSTRUCTED MAUSA 


TO FORWARD A LETTER TO THE 


h& per FB] 
b7C 


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON, D.C., REQUESTING THEIR 
ASSISTANCE. GENZMAN*S DECISION WAS DUE TO THE FACT THAT 
STEINBRENNER WAS RECENTLY A VICTIM/WITNESS IN AN EXTORTION 
TRIAL PROSECUTED BY GENZMAN'S OFFICE, AND THERE WERE UNFOUNDED 
ALLEGATIONS IN THE MEDIA THAT THE FBI AND U.S. ATTORNEY»S 
OFFICE HAD PURSUED INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION IN THIS 
HATTER BASED SOLELY ON PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS WHICH EXISTED 
BETWEEN STEINBRENNER AND MEMBERS OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 


AND FBI IN TAMPA, FLORIDA. MAUSA 


EMPHASIZED THAT 


b6 per FBI 


NOTWITHSTANDING THE TOTAL FALSITY OF THESE ALLEGATIONS, U.S. 
ATTORNEY GENZMAN DID NOT DESIRE ANY APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY 


OR CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON THE PART OF HIS OFFICE.